GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of purity — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right — 45 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.4k
c/coa·submitted 2 years ago by u/camila_lindqvist

purity — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right

Questionbranch of 7 comments

purity — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right. Not a hot take, just something I have not seen said plainly here. Net peptide content is the fraction of the powder that is actually peptide once counterion, water and residual solvent are accounted for. A 99% pure acetate salt can still be about 85% peptide by…

Read the full submission and all 45 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/cormac_pereira212 points·2 years ago

LC-MS gives you identity; UV purity gives you a relative quantity. A document with the first and not the second, or the reverse, is answering half the question.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_sandvik48 points·2 years ago

Area percent is the peak area of your compound over the total integrated area, at one wavelength, on one gradient. It is a relative measure of what the detector saw, not a mass fraction of the vial.

replysharereportpermalink
u/amira_dumitru13 points·2 years ago

UV at 214nm sees the peptide bond and picks up almost everything; at 280nm you are looking at aromatics only. Which wavelength the number came from is part of the number.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_aalto6 points·2 years ago

identity and quantity are two questions and most documents answer one

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_lindqvistOP3 points·2 years ago·edited

Does the lot on the vial match the lot on the page?

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_aalto158 points·2 years ago

batch number, date of analysis, method, individual impurities — that is the minimum set

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_lindqvistOP69 points·2 years ago

post the whole document, not the headline number

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/coa

How to read a certificate of analysis and what it does and does not tell you. Area% versus mass%, identity versus quantity, water content, related substances, acetate counterions, and the difference between a vendor-supplied COA and an independent test on the vial you actually received.

71kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/coa rules
  1. Post the full document. Cropped COAs that hide the batch number or date get removed.
  2. Redact your own name and order id, not the vendor's batch details.
  3. No "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.