GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 7th independent test on WXT — 99.2% on a claimed 98.5%, and the trend is the interesting part — 15 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.8k
c/coa·submitted 11 months ago by u/purity_pedant

[Lab] 7th independent test on WXT — 99.2% on a claimed 98.5%, and the trend is the interesting part

Labbranch of 6 comments

7th independent test on WXT — 99.2% on a claimed 98.5%, and the trend is the interesting part. That is the headline. The document, the batch and the service are below so you can argue with the method rather than with me. Numbers, in the order they matter: 99.2% and 98.5%. Asked ERP for the batch-specific certificate…

Read the full submission and all 15 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 11 months ago
u/chidi_demir341 points·11 months ago

I would not read a rounded figure as evasive. Plenty of documents round to one decimal as house style.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]150 points·11 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/tidy_vialdrawer_pls49 points·11 months ago

Right, and net peptide content is where the counterion and the water go. Both numbers can be honest and very different.

replysharereportpermalink
u/purity_pedantOPanalytical106 points·11 months ago

Are the related substances itemised or is it a single total?

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/coa

How to read a certificate of analysis and what it does and does not tell you. Area% versus mass%, identity versus quantity, water content, related substances, acetate counterions, and the difference between a vendor-supplied COA and an independent test on the vial you actually received.

71kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/coa
c/coa rules
  1. Post the full document. Cropped COAs that hide the batch number or date get removed.
  2. Redact your own name and order id, not the vendor's batch details.
  3. No "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/coa_janitoru/purity_pedantu/coa_collectoru/certified_referenceu/first_hundred
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →