[Lab] identity confirmed but net peptide content was 71%
identity confirmed but net peptide content was 71%. One vial, one service, one member paying, which is the only kind of result this board should treat as evidence. The relevant figures are 71%, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time. Bought small, tested identity first, and only then thought about…
Careful. Regulatory status differs by jurisdiction and has changed; a confident global statement is going to be wrong somewhere.
no clinical trial has established what these threads assert
That is a purity figure, not an identity confirmation. Two different tests and only one answers the question asked.
Correcting myself: I said the regulatory position had not changed and in that jurisdiction it has.
identity, quantity, stability — three separate questions
ask for the mass spectrum, not just the purity number
Correction: that study was in rodents. Worth stating explicitly since the thread has been reading it as clinical.