u/yara_boateng
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Overview — page 2 of 3
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for chromatogram posts in c/hplc · 8 points · 7 months ago
the column has a history and it shows in the peak shape
comment on genuine question about ApoB that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/bloodwork · 30 points · 7 months ago
I would not draw a line through two points, especially when the second was taken at a different time of day.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring LC-MS at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/hplc · 71 points · 7 months ago
Resolution between two peaks depends on retention, selectivity and efficiency.
cagrilintide_enthusiast is right — the integration choice is a decision and it should be stated alongside the result.
comment on week 31 check-in — 11kg down, sulphur burps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bloodwork · 7 points · 7 months ago
do not change three things and then read the panel
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring HPLC at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/hplc · 118 points · 8 months ago
a blank injection between samples costs four minutes and settles most arguments
comment on [Lab] 8th independent test on MKM — 97.9% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part in c/semaglutide · 26 points · 9 months ago
Does nausea track the day after the shot, or is it there all week?
comment on [Question] LC-MS — what am I missing here in c/hplc · 1 points · 9 months ago
report the method or do not report the number
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about TGA until somebody posts a number in c/glp1aus · 1 points · 10 months ago
Subsidy criteria and authority requirements are published. For eligibility questions those documents are authoritative and this board is not.
comment on what changed for me between month 2 and month 11 in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 10 months ago
baseline before you start is worth more than any later panel
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on New Zealand in c/glp1aus · 67 points · 10 months ago
the price you pay depends on the listing status of your indication
comment on [Results] 51 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 11 months ago
Yes. Repeat before you react. Almost every alarming single value I have posted here regressed on the repeat.
comment on am I the only one who found orforglipron harder than the injections in c/orforglipron · 56 points · 11 months ago
Same view. The analytical problem is different enough that the usual purity discussions here do not transfer cleanly.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for gradient posts in c/hplc · 61 points · 11 months ago
Yes. Retention time is a hypothesis about identity. Mass is the answer.
comment on help me understand Australia, I have read the wiki twice in c/glp1aus · -9 points · 1 year ago
Australia and New Zealand have different regulators, different funding bodies and different arrangements. An answer for one is not evidence about the other.
comment on help me understand Australia, I have read the wiki twice in c/glp1aus · 20 points · 1 year ago
Correcting myself: the compounded position changed and my earlier comment was describing the old one.
comment on the bloodwork question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/bloodwork · 6 points · 1 year ago
Is that the same assay, or did the lab change platforms?
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring plateau at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/semaglutide · 85 points · 1 year ago
dose day drift of a day either way is fine, the curve barely notices
comment on the food noise question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/semaglutide · 21 points · 1 year ago
Weight change and appetite change are different endpoints on different timescales. Conflating them is where most of the confusion on this board starts.
comment on [Discussion] the ACHIEVE advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/orforglipron · 1 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning on daily dosing. It changes the exposure profile and it changes adherence, in both directions.
comment on [Question] is 98.1% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error in c/hplc · -18 points · 1 year ago
Carryover from a previous high-concentration injection looks exactly like a small impurity. The blank injection is four minutes and it removes the ambiguity entirely.
comment on am I the only one who found plateau harder than the injections in c/semaglutide · 27 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical of the mechanism you are proposing. Gastric emptying slows, it does not stop, and the timings you describe do not follow from it.
comment on [Vendor] MKM vs CPC on the same compound, same month — both cleared 97.0% in c/semaglutide · 2 points · 1 year ago
the food noise going quiet is the effect people actually describe
comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about orforglipron is guesswork in c/orforglipron · 10 points · 1 year ago
Daily dosing gives a very different exposure profile from a weekly injectable: peaks and troughs within each day rather than a smoothed weekly curve.
comment on [Question] chromatogram — what am I missing here in c/hplc · 56 points · 1 year ago
Disagree. Inter-lab spread of a point or two on this assay is ordinary and calling it a discrepancy misleads people.
comment on [Meta] the chromatogram rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/hplc · 7 points · 1 year ago
a shoulder is not an impurity until you can resolve it
comment on [Results] 36 weeks, 9kg, and oral GLP-1 was the hard part in c/orforglipron · -12 points · 1 year ago
Assumed the peptide purity conversations transferred and they do not. Different analytical problem entirely.
comment on anyone else notice weekly dosing kicking in around week 33 in c/semaglutide · 51 points · 1 year ago
Kept a log from week one and the single most useful column turned out to be waist, not weight.
comment on [Discussion] LC-MS is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/hplc · 54 points · 1 year ago
Retention time shifted 0.4 minutes and I assumed the worst. It was the column temperature.
comment on three years of oral GLP-1 threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/orforglipron · 4 points · 1 year ago
Yes — nothing containing this is approved anywhere, and the threads keep forgetting it.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks, 40kg, and 2.4mg was the hard part in c/semaglutide · 517 points · 1 year ago
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use, so anything in this thread about how a compounded or research vial "should" behave is a chemistry discussion, not a dosing one.
comment on [Discussion] ATTAIN is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/orforglipron · 3 points · 1 year ago
Correction: that is the oral peptide product, which is a different thing entirely. This one is a small molecule.
comment on [Discussion] ATTAIN is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/orforglipron · 19 points · 1 year ago
Daily dosing gives a very different exposure profile from a weekly injectable: peaks and troughs within each day rather than a smoothed weekly curve.
comment on method development — 10 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/hplc · 3 points · 1 year ago
axis labels or the trace is decoration
comment on reading ALT threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/bloodwork · 23 points · 1 year ago
Right, and weight loss itself moves several markers, so attribution is harder than these threads assume.
comment on reading chromatogram threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/hplc · 1 points · 1 year ago
Correction: that is a tailing factor, not a plate count. Different diagnostics for different problems.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 94.2% and 97.9% in c/semaglutide · 3 points · 2 years ago
dose day drift of a day either way is fine, the curve barely notices
comment on [Question] small molecule — what am I missing here in c/orforglipron · 29 points · 2 years ago
Push back: daily dosing is not automatically better adherence.
Disagreeing with this bit: daily dosing is a different adherence problem, not a better one.
comment on [Question] small molecule — what am I missing here in c/orforglipron · 8 points · 2 years ago
Assumed the peptide purity conversations transferred and they do not.
This is the fact the whole board hangs on. Small molecule, not peptide.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about ApoB until somebody posts a number in c/bloodwork · 153 points · 2 years ago
same lab, same conditions, or you are comparing noise
comment on the baseline labs question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/bloodwork · -10 points · 2 years ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?