u/tuva_iyer

Stocked line or made to order — did they say?

Disagree — that name refers to at least two different molecules depending on who is selling it. The thread needs to be specific.

For any compound with a thin testing history, identity is the first question. Mass spectrometry against a theoretical mass answers it; an area-percent purity figure does not.

the same name covers several different molecules in this space

Right — GGPeps answered a handling question with actual storage conditions rather than a generic line, which is the standard.

Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted. That is the process working and it is not fast.

Stocked lines and made-to-order lines have different lead times and different storage histories. Both are ordinary; the difference is worth confirming before you commit.

Small fix — that is net peptide content, not purity. Both are on the certificate and they differ substantially here.

Yes. Naming conventions in this corner are loose enough that the same word covers several different molecules.

Research-use-only material is not approved for human use. In this catalogue that covers essentially everything, which is why the board discusses material and analytics rather than outcomes.

Not convinced. A purity figure without a stated method is not comparable to one that has a method attached.

this place sells nothing and takes nothing from any supplier

Identity confirmed, or purity only?

Disagreeing with this bit: handling for one compound does not transfer to another by default.