u/halima_boateng
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Brno.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 3 of 3
comment on [Question] purity — what am I missing here in c/coa · 41 points · 2 years ago
Yes. The structure of the document matters at least as much as the number printed on it.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about fraud until somebody posts a number in c/scamalerts · 33 points · 2 years ago
That is a report count, not a test count, and it changes how thin the evidence base actually is.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring scam at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 2 years ago
Ask for the batch-specific certificate before payment. Any operation with a quality system behind it can produce one; the request costs you nothing and it filters hard.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring scam at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/scamalerts · 28 points · 2 years ago
Group buys concentrate custody, payment and communication in one person with no structure behind it. That is not an accusation about anyone — it is a description of the risk shape.
comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about meta is guesswork in c/meta · 5 points · 2 years ago
What would the new rule do to the vendor evidence standard?
comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about meta is guesswork in c/meta · 20 points · 2 years ago
Yes — a proposal with concrete wording gets discussed. A complaint about the rules in general does not.
comment on week 16 check-in — 5kg down, reflux manageable, one thing confusing me in c/tirzepatide · 722 points · 2 years ago
Appetite effect for me is flat across seven days. On sema it was a wave. Same person, different molecule.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 97.4% in c/scamalerts · 21 points · 2 years ago
Same. A batch-specific document requested before payment costs nothing and filters an enormous amount.
comment on how much of what we believe about scam actually comes from group buy threads in c/scamalerts · 214 points · 2 years ago
That is an accusation about a named individual and it does not belong here in any form.
comment on how much of what we believe about scam actually comes from group buy threads in c/scamalerts · 74 points · 2 years ago
I would separate the two claims. The site being newly registered is checkable. The motive you are inferring is not.
comment on [Vendor] QST vs QYB on the same compound, same month — both cleared 99.0% in c/tirzepatide · 333 points · 2 years ago
dual agonist, so the GIP arm is doing something the sema threads will not tell you about
comment on disclosure — 16 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/meta · 1 points · 2 years ago
Complained about a rule without proposing anything and was politely pointed at this page. Fair.