genuine question about VendorInvestigate that I am slightly embarrassed to ask — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. What "documentation"…
u/anders_osei
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kristiansand.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Overview — page 3 of 3
comment on genuine question about VendorInvestigate that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 years ago
That is a report count, not a test count. The table lists both and they are very different numbers.
comment on [Discussion] fake COA is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/scamalerts · 122 points · 2 years ago
a domain registered last month with a decade of testimonials is the whole tell
comment on [Discussion] fake COA is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/scamalerts · 1.3k points · 2 years ago
Cloned storefronts copy assets, layout and testimonial text. What they cannot easily copy is a batch-specific document that ties to a lot you can then have tested independently.
comment on [PSA] PeptideMeter is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · -33 points · 2 years ago
What a batch record should carry: the lot identifier, the date of analysis, the method including column and gradient, the individual related substances rather than a total, and the storage condition the stability statement was written against.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 97.4% in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 2 years ago
Correction: that domain is one character different from the one you posted, which is rather the point of this thread.
comment on three years of reship threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/vendorvetting · -28 points · 2 years ago
a claim with no batch number is a marketing document