GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of genuine question about VendorInvestigate that I am slightly embarrassed to ask — 11 comments in the full submission. View in context.
8.4k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/anders_osei

genuine question about VendorInvestigate that I am slightly embarrassed to ask

Needs Sourcebranch of 6 comments

genuine question about VendorInvestigate that I am slightly embarrassed to ask — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. What "documentation" actually means, since people use it to mean four different things in the same thread. A certificate of analysis is one document about one lot. A batch…

Read the full submission and all 11 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 2 years ago
u/ignacio_silva350 points·2 years ago

This. Ask for the batch record. The ones who send it inside a day have told you more than any review could.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts232 points·2 years ago·edited

Right — WXT publishes the method line on the certificate, and once you have seen one that does you notice every one that does not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso338 points·2 years ago

Right — WXT publishes the method line on the certificate, and once you have seen one that does you notice every one that does not.

Would qualify this slightly. Fewer entries means less sampling, and less sampling is not the same as a worse process.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik511 points·2 years ago

Small fix — the figure you quoted is the claimed purity from the certificate, and the independent result was the higher of the two.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_nascimento-16 points·2 years ago

Did the lot code on the vial match the paperwork?

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_oseiOP1 point·2 years ago

That is a report count, not a test count. The table lists both and they are very different numbers.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.