GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 20th independent test on QYB — 97.9% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part — 61 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5.8k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/milos_vestergaard

[Lab] 20th independent test on QYB — 97.9% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part

Labbranch of 9 comments

20th independent test on QYB — 97.9% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part. That is the headline. The document, the batch and the service are below so you can argue with the method rather than with me. Pulling the figures out of the title: 97.9% and 97.0%. All of it is written down as it happened…

Read the full submission and all 61 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 1 year ago
u/patient_labslip_log100 points·1 year ago

reship policy in writing before the order, not after

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaardOP73 points·1 year ago

That is a report count, not a test count. The table lists both and they are very different numbers.

replysharereportpermalink
u/receipts_or_nothingvetting61 points·1 year ago

Not convinced by the ranking-by-vibe approach here. The community number is derived from reports; your feeling is derived from four posts you remember.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_nilsen-5 points·1 year ago

three independent results beat thirty forum posts

replysharereportpermalink
u/ireland_drugs_pay84 points·1 year ago

the interesting column is spread, not maximum

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaardOP73 points·1 year ago

a claim with no batch number is a marketing document

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution103 points·1 year ago

A certificate with a purity figure and no method line is not falsifiable. You cannot reproduce it, you cannot check it, and it tells you nothing about how the number was produced.

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso152 points·1 year ago

The wider-market rows in the directory carry a band and a report count and nothing else, deliberately. Anything more would be manufacturing precision that the evidence does not support.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_krastev57 points·1 year ago

Careful. "Nobody has tested Behemoth Labz" is a statement about this board, not about the supplier. Say the first thing, not the second.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.