[Discussion] we are measuring VendorInvestigate at the wrong time and calling it noise
we are measuring VendorInvestigate at the wrong time and calling it noise — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Inter-lab variance on this assay runs a point or two either way. Two services disagreeing by that much is agreement, not a discrepancy, and treating it otherwise starts pointless…
What a batch record should carry: the lot identifier, the date of analysis, the method including column and gradient, the individual related substances rather than a total, and the storage condition the stability statement was written against.
Mild pushback: a supplier with fewer entries is not worse, it is less sampled. Those are different claims and the table says so.
What a batch record should carry: the lot identifier, the date of analysis, the method including column and gradient, the individual related substance
Agreed — and the corollary is that "no data" and "bad data" have to be written differently. The table separates them for exactly that reason.
Agreed — and the corollary is that "no data" and "bad data" have to be written differently.
This is the whole method in one sentence. Everything else in the thread is elaboration.
Yes. Spread across lots is the number that tells you about the process. A single high result tells you about a vial.