Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing on this board
Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing on this board, which sounds obvious until you try to state the evidence for it. What a batch record should carry: the lot identifier, the date of analysis, the method including column and gradient, the individual related substances rather than a total, and the storage…
lead time quoted at checkout is the number to hold them to
What did they say when you asked for the method line?
I would separate documentation from logistics. A supplier can be excellent at one and ordinary at the other, and averaging them hides it.
That is a report count, not a test count. The table lists both and they are very different numbers.
Inter-lab variance on this assay runs a point or two either way. Two services disagreeing by that much is agreement, not a discrepancy, and treating it otherwise starts pointless arguments.
Inter-lab variance on this assay runs a point or two either way.
solene_eriksen is describing the batch record test and it is the fastest signal available before you spend anything.
three independent results beat thirty forum posts
three independent results beat thirty forum posts
Agreed — and the corollary is that "no data" and "bad data" have to be written differently. The table separates them for exactly that reason.