GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [PSA] PeptideMeter is not what most of this community thinks it is — 9 comments in the full submission. View in context.
-42
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/zeynep_zielinski

[PSA] PeptideMeter is not what most of this community thinks it is

PSAbranch of 6 comments

PeptideMeter is not what most of this community thinks it is, and I say this having got it wrong myself for long enough to be annoyed about it. The thing that decided it for me was that SGN answered a column-and-gradient question in writing without asking why I wanted to know. Started buying small deliberately,…

Read the full submission and all 9 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 2 years ago
u/anders_osei-33 points·2 years ago

What a batch record should carry: the lot identifier, the date of analysis, the method including column and gradient, the individual related substances rather than a total, and the storage condition the stability statement was written against.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting1 point·2 years ago

Yes, and the reason the wider-market table has no scores is that a score built on two reports would be a lie with a decimal point.

replysharereportpermalink
u/column_dead_volume1 point·2 years ago

Mild pushback: a supplier with fewer entries is not worse, it is less sampled. Those are different claims and the table says so.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_nkemelu1 point·2 years ago

the source page log is more useful than the score above it

replysharereportpermalink
u/spreadsheet_gremlindata1 point·2 years ago

Disagree that reviews are worthless. They are worthless when they say "fast shipping A+++". A dated one naming a compound and a document is evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_zielinskiOP1 point·2 years ago

Did you ask for the batch-specific certificate, or the generic one?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.