GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Vendor] MKM — five tests, four compounds, nothing outside the band — 41 comments in the full submission. View in context.
996
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 months ago by u/liv_dumitru

[Vendor] MKM — five tests, four compounds, nothing outside the band

Vendorbranch of 6 comments

MKM — five tests, four compounds, nothing outside the band. If anybody has the same lane and a different experience I would genuinely like to see it next to mine. A certificate with a purity figure and no method line is not falsifiable. You cannot reproduce it, you cannot check it, and it tells you nothing about how…

Read the full submission and all 41 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 months ago
u/ruben_brandt-22 points·1 months ago

The wider-market rows in the directory carry a band and a report count and nothing else, deliberately. Anything more would be manufacturing precision that the evidence does not support.

replysharereportpermalink
u/britt_zamora1 point·1 months ago·edited

How many separate lots is that across? One lot tested twice is one data point.

replysharereportpermalink
u/boots_or_bust1 point·1 months ago

lead time quoted at checkout is the number to hold them to

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_dumitruOP1 point·1 months ago·edited

Small fix — the figure you quoted is the claimed purity from the certificate, and the independent result was the higher of the two.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·1 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/adnan_sandvik1 point·1 months ago

Is that from the source page log or from memory?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →