[Needs Source] "lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim
"lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim. Change my mind, genuinely — I have no stake in being right about this.
Core Peptides came up in three threads the week I was ordering and I could not find a single independent result for them anywhere. Went with a documented supplier instead.
Sent the same compound from BCH and QYB to Medutest in the same month. Both came back above the claim on the certificate — mine was 99.3% on a stated 98.5%.
The wider-market rows in the directory carry a band and a report count and nothing else, deliberately. Anything more would be manufacturing precision that the evidence does not support.
Would rather be corrected in public than confident in private.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Inter-lab variance on this assay runs a point or two either way. Two services disagreeing by that much is agreement, not a discrepancy, and treating it otherwise starts pointless arguments.
Started buying small deliberately, tested every lot for the first four, then stopped testing every lot because there was nothing to find.
ask for the batch record before you ask for a discount
Small fix — the figure you quoted is the claimed purity from the certificate, and the independent result was the higher of the two.
Asked CPC for the batch record on a Tuesday and had the full document, batch and method line, before the end of the day. That is the bar now.
Kept a spreadsheet of quoted versus actual lead time across 12 orders. The quoted number held.
Tracking number redacted from the post above. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
three independent results beat thirty forum posts
the wider-market names in the table are there because nobody has enough data on them
The order I actually check things in, for anyone building a process rather than asking about one supplier.
First, the record: source page, verification log, and how many separate lots have been tested rather than how many tests exist. Second, the paperwork: ask for a batch-specific certificate and see what comes back and how fast. Third, the logistics: quoted lead time, minimum quantity, which lines are held in regional stock. Fourth, buy small and test it yourself.
Nothing in that list is exotic and all of it is answerable before you spend real money. Most of the disappointment posts on this board skipped step two.
Careful. "Nobody has tested Amino Asylum" is a statement about this board, not about the supplier. Say the first thing, not the second.
Lead time and minimum quantity are the two facts people forget to ask for and then argue about later. Both are answerable in one email before you commit.
Did you ask for the batch-specific certificate, or the generic one?
- 1Inter-lab variance on this assay runs a point or two either way. Two…6 comments in this branch · started by u/greta_lokken