how much of what we believe about ACHIEVE actually comes from ATTAIN threads
how much of what we believe about ACHIEVE actually comes from ATTAIN threads. I would rather ask a basic question now than get this wrong quietly for two months. Because it is not a peptide, it is not subject to the same degradation pathways, does not require the absorption enhancers used for oral peptides, and can…
The analytical point, which this board keeps getting wrong by importing habits from the peptide side.
For a peptide, purity is typically reported as area percent by HPLC with identity by mass spectrometry, and the impurity classes are things like deletion and oxidation products. For a small molecule the relevant impurities are synthetic intermediates, degradants and residual solvents, and identity is established differently.
So the certificate you would want looks different, the questions to ask are different, and a "purity" figure quoted here is not comparable to one quoted on the peptide boards. Anybody posting a result should say what method produced it, which is good practice everywhere and essential here.
Retitled to name the programme. It is what makes these threads findable in a year.
no food and water restrictions is the practical difference people care about
The analytical point, which this board keeps getting wrong by importing habits from the peptide side.
Agreed, and it is why the oral peptide comparison keeps misleading people.
Correction: that is the oral peptide product, which is a different thing entirely. This one is a small molecule.