GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Meta] the province rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining — 7 comments in the full submission. View in context.
0
c/glp1canada·submitted 1 year ago by u/sigrid_kaufmann

[Meta] the province rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining

Questionbranch of 6 comments

Putting this to the board: the province rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining. The pharmacist sorted in five minutes what the phone line had not managed in a fortnight. Spent three weeks on what turned out to be a quantity limit rather than a coverage question. Moved provinces and the coverage…

Read the full submission and all 7 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/mei_cardoso4 points·1 year ago

Special authorization is a documented exception process with published criteria. Applications that answer those criteria explicitly, point by point, fare better than general clinical narratives.

replysharereportpermalink
u/formulary_fighterappeals2 points·1 year ago

Have you asked the pharmacist to check?

replysharereportpermalink
u/santiago_szabo1 point·1 year ago

Nothing here is medical or legal advice. The pharmacist and the prescriber are the people who can act, and both are faster than a forum.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sigrid_kaufmannOP1 point·1 year ago·edited

employer plans have their own criteria and their own appeals

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_nascimento1 point·1 year ago

employer plans have their own criteria and their own appeals

Agreed — write the application against the published criteria rather than around them.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sigrid_kaufmannOP0 points·1 year ago

Has your plan renewed since the last time you applied?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1canada

Canadian access: provincial formulary differences, private plan coverage, the special-authorisation process, cross-border pricing arbitrage and why the Ontario answer is not the Alberta answer.

17kmembers
62submissions
Apr 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/glp1canada
c/glp1canada rules
  1. Name your province. Coverage is provincial.
  2. Private plan details: redact your group number.
  3. No cross-border purchasing instructions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/canada_coverageu/formulary_fighteru/lane_watcher
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →