[PSA] private plan is not what most of this community thinks it is
Putting this at the top of the board where it belongs: private plan is not what most of this community thinks it is.
The three separate questions people ask here as though they were one.
Is it approved for sale — a national regulatory question with one answer. Is it covered — a provincial or private-plan question with many answers. Can I actually get this quantity dispensed — a quantity-limit question that is separate from coverage and stops as many people.
Say which of the three you are asking and name your province and plan type. Threads that do this get answered in two replies; threads that do not generate a page of people talking past each other, all of them correct about somewhere else.
How to write a special authorization request that gets approved.
Get the published criteria for your province. Answer them explicitly, in their own terms, in the same order. Attach what has been documented — what was tried, at what dose, for how long, with what outcome — as dates rather than narrative. Where a criterion cannot be met, have the prescriber say why in the criterion’s own language rather than around it.
Members here who have done this describe a much better hit rate than those who submitted a clinical letter that did not engage with the form. It is an administrative exercise, and treating it as one is the whole trick. None of which is advice — it is what the threads report.
Cash pricing, which people skip because they assume coverage is the only route.
Prices at the counter vary between pharmacies, sometimes substantially, in the same city. Members here have found spreads worth a real amount per month by ringing four places and asking for the cash price of a specific presentation.
That does not make coverage unimportant. It does mean that while an authorization is in process — which can take weeks — knowing the actual cash spread is worth half an hour of phone calls. Post what you find with the province and the month; the comparison threads here work for exactly the same reason the UK pricing tracker does.
Sceptical readings welcome. The confident ones are the ones I distrust.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the criteria change at plan renewal and nobody announces it
That is an employer plan process, and the provincial route is different in both form and timeline.
That is an employer plan process, and the provincial route is different in both form and timeline.
Adding the fastest step — ask the pharmacist. They can usually check in minutes.
the criteria change at plan renewal and nobody announces it
Agreed — write the application against the published criteria rather than around them.
Has your plan renewed since the last time you applied?
employer plans have their own criteria and their own appeals
employer plans have their own criteria and their own appeals
This is why every thread here needs a province in it.
Nothing here is medical or legal advice. The pharmacist and the prescriber are the people who can act, and both are faster than a forum.
Yes. Cash prices vary and comparing them before assuming coverage is the only route is worth doing.
keep every form, every date, every reference number
Agreed. Province first — coverage is a provincial decision and national answers are wrong somewhere by construction.
quantity limits are as common a barrier as coverage itself
formulary decisions are provincial, so the province is the first fact
special authorization forms are published, read them before applying
The pharmacist sorted in five minutes what the phone line had not managed in a fortnight.
Correction: that is regulatory approval, not coverage. They are separate decisions by separate bodies.
Compared cash prices across four pharmacies before pursuing coverage and the spread was larger than I expected.
Left up. It distinguishes a rejected claim from a denied authorization, which most posts here do not.
a denial letter names a criterion, that is your handle
Push back: approval by the national regulator says nothing about whether any plan will pay.
- 1Nothing here is medical or legal advice. The pharmacist and the prescriber…10 comments in this branch · started by u/niels_norgaard
- 2the criteria change at plan renewal and nobody announces it8 comments in this branch · started by u/cagrilintide_enthusiast