GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] TFC cagri — Janoshik came back 98.1% against a claimed 98.0% — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
435
c/cagrilintide·submitted 3 months ago by u/sanne_laurent

[Lab] TFC cagri — Janoshik came back 98.1% against a claimed 98.0%

Labbranch of 6 comments

Filing this under things worth writing down: TFC cagri — Janoshik came back 98.1% against a claimed 98.0%. Since the title puts numbers in the shop window: 98.1% and 98.0%. The tolerability tables were more informative than the headline numbers, which is usually the case and never how it gets summarised. Went looking…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 3 months ago
u/amylin_amyMOD88 points·3 months ago

Standing reminder: nothing here is approved standalone, research material is not for human use, and no dosing schedules for other members.

replysharereportpermalink
u/b12_baseline70 points·3 months ago

Is there any independent purity data on this compound that you have seen?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting23 points·2 months ago

Push back: the evidence base here is thin enough that a confident ranking against the established compounds is not supportable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/pancreatitis_scare5 points·2 months ago

What does the tolerability table in that paper actually say?

replysharereportpermalink
u/sanne_laurentOP3 points·2 months ago

Sent a vial to VendorInvestigate because there was almost nothing on file for this compound. 97.6% against a claimed 97.0%, and I posted it because the log needs entries.

replysharereportpermalink
u/pancreatitis_scare-26 points·2 months ago

Same view — long-acting is the engineering achievement here, and it is why the molecule exists at all.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/cagrilintide

Amylin analog pharmacology and the CagriSema combination: why amylin and GLP-1 co-agonism produces a different satiety profile, the REDEFINE readouts, and the very limited pool of people handling cagrilintide as research material.

19kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/cagrilintide
c/cagrilintide rules
  1. Amylin is not a GLP-1. Posts conflating them get corrected.
  2. CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed-dose. Do not extrapolate to self-mixing.
  3. Not approved anywhere. Keep posts descriptive, not instructional.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/amylin_amyu/incretin_ivyu/ledger_mod
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →