GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
PR

u/priya_ogunleye

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bursa.

member · joined 15 Jun 2025

12,282post karma
2,791comment karma
5submissions
44comments

Comments — page 2 of 2

comment on [Question] is 94.2% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error in c/hplc · 67 points · 2 years ago

That is area percent, not mass percent. The trace cannot give you the second one.

permalink

comment on [PSA] test results are not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 29 points · 2 years ago

Split one vial between Medutest and PeptideMeter.

lukas_vermeulen is right that the band matters more than the peak. Consistency across lots is the finding.

permalink

comment on [PSA] excursion is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/coldchain · 1 points · 2 years ago

write the reconstitution date on the vial

permalink

comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about HPLC until somebody posts a number in c/hplc · 37 points · 2 years ago

a shoulder is not an impurity until you can resolve it

permalink

Trophy case

No trophies yet. Most accounts here never get one.

Cake day 15 Jun 2025
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.